Finite invariants #152
Draft
Finite invariants #152
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
The problem is that it normally isn't possible for no one to have the lock Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
… a universal invariant Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: James R. Wilcox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Fischman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was an experiment to use the BDD checker's ability to generate the set of all backwards-reachable states to try and come up with an invariant that would hold for any sort sizes. It currently works for
lockserver, but the BDD checker is too slow to test it on longer examples. (Also, the current invariant inference part of the implementation can only generateforallinvariants.)